What gears...

The place to talk Slicks. All we ask is that discussion has something to do with slicks...

Moderators: Casey 65, Kid

User avatar
noley99
Posts: 208
Joined: January 14, 2011, 10:16 pm
Location: Senoia, Ga

What gears...

Post by noley99 »

... should I run with my new drive train.

302 Carb w/5 speed tranny out of a 92 Mustang GT.
Family First!
User avatar
Uncle Skip
Posts: 4695
Joined: July 15, 2006, 8:30 pm
Location: Pearland, Texas
United States of America

Post by Uncle Skip »

Noley.
That is strictly a value judgement. Depends on what you want to achieve. If you're looking for some grunt at the stoplight and good fuel milage, I'd say the 3:25 would be a very good compromise for your setup.
But remember, its just my opinion.
U@ss
I'm not arguing with you. I'm just explaining why I'm right.
Pardon me. Does your deaug bite?
User avatar
noley99
Posts: 208
Joined: January 14, 2011, 10:16 pm
Location: Senoia, Ga

Post by noley99 »

I guess I should have added a few more details...

"grunt at the stop light"
Fuel mileage
Good mid range pull
Family First!
User avatar
frdnut
Posts: 137
Joined: September 10, 2010, 9:45 pm
Location: Ontario,Canada

Post by frdnut »

I've always felt the 302s were a little lacking in a truck(my daily driver is a 1996 5.0)..Especially if your looking for "grunt"..Since you have the 5 speed with an over drive gear I would go for a fairly low rear gear to help get you going..Something like a 3.70..
1965 F100(the wifes)
1968 Mustang 408W stroker
User avatar
Greg D
Posts: 10113
Joined: September 13, 2006, 4:39 pm
Location: Podunk Iowa
United States of America

Post by Greg D »

The stock "performance" or optional gear ratio for a 5.0 Mustang would be 3.73:1 (3.56:1 were standard equipment most years).
You Uni won't weigh a whole lot more so that wouldn't be a bad start.
With a 6 being original in it you probably have 3.89:1 anyway.
1964 F 100 - I am going to do "something" with it.......

viewtopic.php?f=32&t=15942

1987 Mustang LX Convertible, 2.3 Auto - cruiser.
1994 F 150 XLT 2WD


~ Yes - I adopted another cat..............

Cam L Milan,
You'll be missed my friend.
jamesdfo
Posts: 1637
Joined: February 15, 2011, 10:32 am
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Canada

Post by jamesdfo »

Well, I had an '88 roller motor (carb'd) with the stock C6 in my old '81 SB, and it REALLY didn't like pulling that kind of weight with the stock 2:75's.....so I switched to 3:25's, MUCH BETTER!!
With the 5 spd manual, you have OD in 5th, so you should easily get away with 3:55's or perhaps even 3:73's....but 3:55's would probably be the best compromise between zoom zoom & mileage:):)

James
User avatar
noley99
Posts: 208
Joined: January 14, 2011, 10:16 pm
Location: Senoia, Ga

Post by noley99 »

I appreciate all the replies, it's really helped me.

As info, the engine will ultimately have around 450 RWHP.
Family First!
User avatar
matt2491
Posts: 347
Joined: February 21, 2008, 4:51 pm
Location: Billerica, MA

Post by matt2491 »

3.89 and your done. With the T5 ratios, you'll have a stump pulling 1st gear and a sweet cruising overdrive.
Just driving my truck.
ICEMAN6166
Posts: 11470
Joined: July 11, 2006, 11:28 am
Location: Dove Creek, Co. elevation 6842
Poland

Post by ICEMAN6166 »

pretty sure 3.89 is the ratio used in the d44 posi axle factory installed on slicks.
1966 F250 4x4
1964 Rambler Ambassador 990
Rest in peace departed Slick family members
Cam Milam
Lesley Ferguson
Steve Lopes
John Sutton
User avatar
noley99
Posts: 208
Joined: January 14, 2011, 10:16 pm
Location: Senoia, Ga

Post by noley99 »

ICEMAN6166 wrote:pretty sure 3.89 is the ratio used in the d44 posi axle factory installed on slicks.
So your saying that I have a positrac rear end? I have not checked.
Family First!
ICEMAN6166
Posts: 11470
Joined: July 11, 2006, 11:28 am
Location: Dove Creek, Co. elevation 6842
Poland

Post by ICEMAN6166 »

noley99 wrote:
ICEMAN6166 wrote:pretty sure 3.89 is the ratio used in the d44 posi axle factory installed on slicks.
So your saying that I have a positrac rear end? I have not checked.
if its a dana 44. if so it will have a removable (bolt on) cover on the back.
1966 F250 4x4
1964 Rambler Ambassador 990
Rest in peace departed Slick family members
Cam Milam
Lesley Ferguson
Steve Lopes
John Sutton
MadMaxetc
Posts: 2600
Joined: July 10, 2006, 12:00 pm
Location: Wichita, KS
Contact:
United States of America

Post by MadMaxetc »

What size tires? What RPM do you want to cruze at in OD at what speed?

450 RWHP will tear up a T-5 in a heavy truck aplication. :2cents:
Dan
Project: '63 F-100 LWB / 460 / C6 / 2x4
My Build Thread
ProStreet66
Posts: 95
Joined: October 19, 2006, 8:51 pm
Location: Saratoga,NY

Post by ProStreet66 »

I have 4.30 in mine with a 460 and c6 with 33x21.5 tires on the back. But I am looking to jerk the front wheels off the ground when I leave the light.
User avatar
noley99
Posts: 208
Joined: January 14, 2011, 10:16 pm
Location: Senoia, Ga

Post by noley99 »

[/quote]

if its a dana 44. if so it will have a removable (bolt on) cover on the back.[/quote]

Then no I don't have one. Didn't think so but was hopefull :)

MadMaxetc, I have 235/60 on the rear and I would like to see around 1800 to 2K in OD at about 65 to 70 or so. The tranny is a built T5 with a heavy duty clutch. I will post the particulars once I get down to my Dad's shop and take a look.
Family First!
User avatar
Greg D
Posts: 10113
Joined: September 13, 2006, 4:39 pm
Location: Podunk Iowa
United States of America

Post by Greg D »

No rear cover = 9" Ford.
There should be a tag on one of the studs on the center section. It will have some numeric codes on it that will tell you all about the rear axle.
post the numbers and we'll tell you what you have.
1964 F 100 - I am going to do "something" with it.......

viewtopic.php?f=32&t=15942

1987 Mustang LX Convertible, 2.3 Auto - cruiser.
1994 F 150 XLT 2WD


~ Yes - I adopted another cat..............

Cam L Milan,
You'll be missed my friend.
User avatar
noley99
Posts: 208
Joined: January 14, 2011, 10:16 pm
Location: Senoia, Ga

Post by noley99 »

Greg D wrote:No rear cover = 9" Ford.
There should be a tag on one of the studs on the center section. It will have some numeric codes on it that will tell you all about the rear axle.
post the numbers and we'll tell you what you have.
Thanks Greg, I will check and post.
Family First!
MadMaxetc
Posts: 2600
Joined: July 10, 2006, 12:00 pm
Location: Wichita, KS
Contact:
United States of America

Post by MadMaxetc »

In order to hit the RPM you want at 60-75 you will need to run 3.50 gears.

Here is a chart made just for your truck. (I can change stuff if you want, or runn lots of combos.

(Click to make BIGGER)
Image

I can do the same chart for other members, or if you have excel I can send you the file.
Dan
Project: '63 F-100 LWB / 460 / C6 / 2x4
My Build Thread
User avatar
frdnut
Posts: 137
Joined: September 10, 2010, 9:45 pm
Location: Ontario,Canada

Post by frdnut »

450 rwhp from a 302?..Can you describe the build?..I am thinking it must have some sort of forced induction or it is going to be at a very high rpm..This will definetly affect what sort of gears you want to run..
1965 F100(the wifes)
1968 Mustang 408W stroker
User avatar
charliemccraney
Posts: 1743
Joined: July 9, 2008, 10:02 pm
Location: Lawrenceville, GA

Post by charliemccraney »

I agree with the above statement.

Unless you're running a supercharger or turbo to achieve that power level, it is very unlikely that it will be happy cruising at 1800-2000rpm.

If the T5 is built, it will very likely handle that power just fine. What is your overdrive ratio? The G Force gears use .59 which will require a pretty short rear gear for cruising.
Lawrenceville, Ga
1961 F100 Unibody
318 Y-block (292 +.070 bore, +.170 stroke), FMS T5-Z w/Mustang 10.5" diaphragm clutch.
Motocentro
Posts: 145
Joined: November 7, 2007, 9:05 pm
Location: Atlanta

Post by Motocentro »

frdnut wrote:I've always felt the 302s were a little lacking in a truck(my daily driver is a 1996 5.0)..Especially if your looking for "grunt"..Since you have the 5 speed with an over drive gear I would go for a fairly low rear gear to help get you going..Something like a 3.70..
I second the 3.70's. My truck came stock with those behind a 240. There is a little less power in the 302 (of course) but you can get much better mileage - also they rev like a motorcycle compared to an big block (esp if you rollerize the entire valve-train). If you are doing a lot of around town driving this may not be the case. I do a little of both so they work out for me. Putting a "towing/economy" cam made a huge difference as well. I run a 302 with an Isky 257 roller, AOD through 3.70's in heavy Traffic (ATlanta proper, not suburbia) and it runs like a scalded dog when asked to.

Wait - 3.89's? Maybe I have a 3.89. Not sure but i can say this:

Grunt at stoplight - check (actually "hell yes").
Fuel Mileage - check (when i keep my foot out of it)
Good midrange - check (highway driving is no joke. you should see the looks when a ricer or BMW pulls up and wants to play followed by a quick "walk-away" by my Slick).

Jim
My new signature.
Post Reply