65 f100 240 cid engine rebuild

The place to talk Slicks. All we ask is that discussion has something to do with slicks...

Moderators: Casey 65, Kid

stswartz
Posts: 62
Joined: September 30, 2011, 9:26 pm
Location: Springville AL
United States of America

65 f100 240 cid engine rebuild

Post by stswartz »

Image

I strongly considering rebuilding the 240 on my 65 f100, instead of installing a 302 or 351. I have a Warner T18 4 spd tranny. i have found some articles about how they used to drag race this engine in the mid 80s. Been looking at cliffords 6=8 and this looks to be a good option.

Would you go fuel injection like a howell system that uses a throttle body or stay with a holly or carter 390 cfm. I have a howell system on a jeep rebuild i did and love it. I'm looking at headers, intake, head rework, moderate to aggressive cam and 10:1 compression for the rebuild.

love to read what you think

spelling only counts in english claas
Steve
User avatar
Alan Mclennan
Posts: 9324
Joined: October 14, 2006, 6:16 pm
Location: In the shed... Cranebrook NSW
Australia

Post by Alan Mclennan »

Steve, I`d say go with it!, I sometimes wish I had gone that route!, maybe next time 8)
Honey, If I say I`ll fix something I will, there`s no need to remind me every 6 months!!
66 f100 tabletop swb 351 Clevo C6 "Beryl"

Slick Stock 3 KCMO
Slick Stock 4 Altoona
Slick Stock 5 KCMO
Slick Stock 6 Altoona
Slick Stock 7 Salina KS
Slick Stock 8.............................. cry.gif
User avatar
Blackwaterforge
Posts: 893
Joined: March 13, 2008, 9:22 am
Location: Alabama
Contact:
United States of America

Post by Blackwaterforge »

I have a 66 F-250 with a 300 6cyl and T-18.
It is totally stock and is my daily driver.
It's easy to work on and dependable.
If it cain't be fixed with a sledge hammer it must be an electrical problem!
Gritsngumbo
Posts: 5441
Joined: August 4, 2007, 4:15 pm
Location: Monroe, Louisiana
United States of America

Post by Gritsngumbo »

I'd say go for it also.
If you understand what you’re doing, you’re not learning anything.


LITTLE RED: 64 F100 Short Style
BIG RED: 62 F100 Long Uni
BIG “UN": 63 F250 Long Flare
BBW RED: 61 F100 CC BBW Long Uni
CRIMSON CREW: 63 F100 "Stageway" Long Flare Crew Cab
"RANGER": 66 F100 CC Long Flatbed
"AVA" 1963 Avion T-20 Travel Trailer
“Lucille” 1955 New Moon 44’ Travel Trailer
User avatar
Mellvis
Posts: 464
Joined: September 23, 2006, 9:54 am
Location: South West Ohio

Post by Mellvis »

Would you get rid of your old dog, just to get a bigger one? Old V8s are everywhere, sixes aren't as common (or at least I think). A six sounds cool, it's paid for, and probably will be about the same economy. The old man always said if it ain't broke, don't fix it.
1965 F100 "Papaw's Pride"

"So I'm working on a cistern inlet valve and the guy hands me a lock nut wrench! I was like 'What is this, a drainpipe slipknot!'" -Flo
User avatar
slickmainer
Posts: 2555
Joined: October 8, 2007, 6:41 pm
Location: Auburn Maine
Contact:
United States of America

Post by slickmainer »

I had a 240 in my 65. It was a great engine (for the short time I had it) always started and never a drop on the floor
Last edited by slickmainer on October 18, 2011, 1:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
--Gregg--
you can't get there from here
bruceandersson
Posts: 906
Joined: August 12, 2009, 9:44 am
Location: Ohio

rebuild six

Post by bruceandersson »

I put a 300 six out of a mid-80's box van in my '65. It had low mileage, the electronic distributor and cost a lot less that a rebuild. I've since put on an offenhauser manifold and ceramic headers. I had some issues with the Holley 390 and am currently running an edelbrock 500 carb. My latest research indicates that a quadrajet from the mid-70's might be a better carb that either of the others. Better mileage and better response from the secondaries. I like the set up overall, but the linkage gets interesting as the manifold mounts the carb 90 degrees from the original and linkage needs to be changed. I also put int he 4 spd manual OD trans out of the same truck to try and improve mileage. I don't need the creeper low from the original 4 spds. The trick set up is supposed to be using the 240 head on a 300 block to improve compression.
rwhistles
Posts: 553
Joined: October 15, 2006, 7:42 pm
Location: winter haven, Florida
United States of America

Post by rwhistles »

stick with the six. I'm pullin the 292 and going back with a 300 six.
1961 F350 pick up
1962
1963
1964
1965
1966 F350 camper
samdog1966
Posts: 106
Joined: March 15, 2009, 8:57 pm
Location: Johnston R.I.

Post by samdog1966 »

I have a 240 in my 66. The po installed Clifford 6=8,headers,Mallory unilite, and a holly 2 barrel carb. I have had the truck for about 4 years. It runs great.The 240 is a great motor.
User avatar
62galxe
Posts: 1567
Joined: June 8, 2007, 4:38 pm
Location: Magnolia,Texas

Post by 62galxe »

heres a link to ford six website.
http://www.fordsix.com/
1963 uni PATINA BLUE
1965 short bed
stswartz
Posts: 62
Joined: September 30, 2011, 9:26 pm
Location: Springville AL
United States of America

got it thanks for the help

Post by stswartz »

got the site thanks for the help
Steve
stswartz
Posts: 62
Joined: September 30, 2011, 9:26 pm
Location: Springville AL
United States of America

Engine is out

Post by stswartz »

Engine and tranny are out and there is more antifreeze than oil in the pan and the pistons are 60 over. They also failed the finger nail test on the tops of the cylinder

looks like a total rebuild with new jugs
Steve
User avatar
charliemccraney
Posts: 1743
Joined: July 9, 2008, 10:02 pm
Location: Lawrenceville, GA

Post by charliemccraney »

If you need to sleeve the cylinders, you're probably better off to replace the block. In my area, to sleeve an entire 6cyl is about $900. If 240s are beefy, like Y-Blocks, you should sonic check the cylinder walls to see if you can go bigger. Even if you need a custom set of pistons, it will probably be cheaper than sleeving. For me though it'd probably be a good excuse to upgrade to a 300 because for less than the cost of custom pistons or sleeving, I can buy several 300s.
Lawrenceville, Ga
1961 F100 Unibody
318 Y-block (292 +.070 bore, +.170 stroke), FMS T5-Z w/Mustang 10.5" diaphragm clutch.
MadMaxetc
Posts: 2600
Joined: July 10, 2006, 12:00 pm
Location: Wichita, KS
Contact:
United States of America

Post by MadMaxetc »

I agree. get a good 300 short block and rebuild your 240 head. some EFI exhaust manifolds and a Clifford intake and you will have a sweet little build.
Dan
Project: '63 F-100 LWB / 460 / C6 / 2x4
My Build Thread
fire truck
Posts: 2141
Joined: January 17, 2010, 9:06 pm
Location: Down in Mississippi and up to no good
United States of America

Post by fire truck »

I have a 67 240 with over sized valves, clifford headers, offy intake, carter carb ect sitting in my garage... Drop me a line if you're interested....
So good lookin' that I've attracted an international stalker.




Rest in Peace Bumpstick....I miss ya man.
cooter
Posts: 354
Joined: July 12, 2010, 6:45 pm
Location: Edmonton Alberta

Post by cooter »

do not sleeve the block, start with a 300 if you are going six. Maybe a good candidate for a turbo!
why put off till tommorow what you can put off alltogether
manimal
Posts: 18
Joined: October 14, 2011, 3:47 pm
Location: Cherry Valley,Ca

Post by manimal »

It's my understanding that the 240 and 300 are the same block. I have a std/std 300 block crank and rods. I also have the 240 head from a 1970 F100 I scrapped. SO I am going to build it for something....just a bit confused on what!?
Either engine will be great for you. But a 300 will probably be easier to find. You can use your crank and rods in a 300 block and still have a 240. so all you need is a block if your crank is in good shape.
stswartz
Posts: 62
Joined: September 30, 2011, 9:26 pm
Location: Springville AL
United States of America

300 vs 240

Post by stswartz »

That also is my understanding that the crank and heads are the only difference between the 240 and the 300. we'll wait and see but i'm betting the crank is as worn as the rest of the engine. I had asked the guys at clifford 6=8 about changing to the 300 before i pulled the engine and they reccomended staying with the 240. Even with less horsepower you would get up the rpm curve quicker due to the shorter stroke.
Steve
manimal
Posts: 18
Joined: October 14, 2011, 3:47 pm
Location: Cherry Valley,Ca

Post by manimal »

I just scrapped my 240 block that was .060 w/ #5 cylinder cracked. The crank is .010/.010, I still have it and the rods/pistons. Look at the back of the bearing shell(rod and main) it should say the oversize. Even if its .020 under and needing a grind dont be afraid of .030....it will be just fine.
The 240 is a great engine, but I think the 300 will not have to "work" as hard to move the truck as a 240 will. Due to the longer stroke.
ford6t5
Posts: 99
Joined: May 14, 2009, 2:05 pm
Location: netherlands
Netherlands

Post by ford6t5 »

@madmaxect

I agree. get a good 300 short block and rebuild your 240 head. some EFI exhaust manifolds and a Clifford intake and you will have a sweet little build

what will a combination like that do horsepower and torque wise?

i have a good (rebuild) 300 in my '65 and looking to get it more powerfull.
and a turbo is not my cup of tea.

any more options ore way's to go?

thinking to change the 300 for a 302 v8 that i have but i like the 300.

see ya

twan
Post Reply