What gears...
What gears...
... should I run with my new drive train.
302 Carb w/5 speed tranny out of a 92 Mustang GT.
302 Carb w/5 speed tranny out of a 92 Mustang GT.
Family First!
- Uncle Skip
- Posts: 4695
- Joined: July 15, 2006, 8:30 pm
- Location: Pearland, Texas

Noley.
That is strictly a value judgement. Depends on what you want to achieve. If you're looking for some grunt at the stoplight and good fuel milage, I'd say the 3:25 would be a very good compromise for your setup.
But remember, its just my opinion.
U@ss
That is strictly a value judgement. Depends on what you want to achieve. If you're looking for some grunt at the stoplight and good fuel milage, I'd say the 3:25 would be a very good compromise for your setup.
But remember, its just my opinion.
U@ss
I'm not arguing with you. I'm just explaining why I'm right.
Pardon me. Does your deaug bite?
Pardon me. Does your deaug bite?
I've always felt the 302s were a little lacking in a truck(my daily driver is a 1996 5.0)..Especially if your looking for "grunt"..Since you have the 5 speed with an over drive gear I would go for a fairly low rear gear to help get you going..Something like a 3.70..
1965 F100(the wifes)
1968 Mustang 408W stroker
1968 Mustang 408W stroker
The stock "performance" or optional gear ratio for a 5.0 Mustang would be 3.73:1 (3.56:1 were standard equipment most years).
You Uni won't weigh a whole lot more so that wouldn't be a bad start.
With a 6 being original in it you probably have 3.89:1 anyway.
You Uni won't weigh a whole lot more so that wouldn't be a bad start.
With a 6 being original in it you probably have 3.89:1 anyway.
1964 F 100 - I am going to do "something" with it.......
viewtopic.php?f=32&t=15942
1987 Mustang LX Convertible, 2.3 Auto - cruiser.
1994 F 150 XLT 2WD
~ Yes - I adopted another cat..............
Cam L Milan,
You'll be missed my friend.
viewtopic.php?f=32&t=15942
1987 Mustang LX Convertible, 2.3 Auto - cruiser.
1994 F 150 XLT 2WD
~ Yes - I adopted another cat..............
Cam L Milan,
You'll be missed my friend.
Well, I had an '88 roller motor (carb'd) with the stock C6 in my old '81 SB, and it REALLY didn't like pulling that kind of weight with the stock 2:75's.....so I switched to 3:25's, MUCH BETTER!!
With the 5 spd manual, you have OD in 5th, so you should easily get away with 3:55's or perhaps even 3:73's....but 3:55's would probably be the best compromise between zoom zoom & mileage:):)
James
With the 5 spd manual, you have OD in 5th, so you should easily get away with 3:55's or perhaps even 3:73's....but 3:55's would probably be the best compromise between zoom zoom & mileage:):)
James
-
ICEMAN6166
- Posts: 11470
- Joined: July 11, 2006, 11:28 am
- Location: Dove Creek, Co. elevation 6842

-
ICEMAN6166
- Posts: 11470
- Joined: July 11, 2006, 11:28 am
- Location: Dove Creek, Co. elevation 6842

if its a dana 44. if so it will have a removable (bolt on) cover on the back.noley99 wrote:So your saying that I have a positrac rear end? I have not checked.ICEMAN6166 wrote:pretty sure 3.89 is the ratio used in the d44 posi axle factory installed on slicks.
1966 F250 4x4
1964 Rambler Ambassador 990
Rest in peace departed Slick family members
Cam Milam
Lesley Ferguson
Steve Lopes
John Sutton
1964 Rambler Ambassador 990
Rest in peace departed Slick family members
Cam Milam
Lesley Ferguson
Steve Lopes
John Sutton
-
ProStreet66
- Posts: 95
- Joined: October 19, 2006, 8:51 pm
- Location: Saratoga,NY
[/quote]
if its a dana 44. if so it will have a removable (bolt on) cover on the back.[/quote]
Then no I don't have one. Didn't think so but was hopefull
MadMaxetc, I have 235/60 on the rear and I would like to see around 1800 to 2K in OD at about 65 to 70 or so. The tranny is a built T5 with a heavy duty clutch. I will post the particulars once I get down to my Dad's shop and take a look.
if its a dana 44. if so it will have a removable (bolt on) cover on the back.[/quote]
Then no I don't have one. Didn't think so but was hopefull
MadMaxetc, I have 235/60 on the rear and I would like to see around 1800 to 2K in OD at about 65 to 70 or so. The tranny is a built T5 with a heavy duty clutch. I will post the particulars once I get down to my Dad's shop and take a look.
Family First!
No rear cover = 9" Ford.
There should be a tag on one of the studs on the center section. It will have some numeric codes on it that will tell you all about the rear axle.
post the numbers and we'll tell you what you have.
There should be a tag on one of the studs on the center section. It will have some numeric codes on it that will tell you all about the rear axle.
post the numbers and we'll tell you what you have.
1964 F 100 - I am going to do "something" with it.......
viewtopic.php?f=32&t=15942
1987 Mustang LX Convertible, 2.3 Auto - cruiser.
1994 F 150 XLT 2WD
~ Yes - I adopted another cat..............
Cam L Milan,
You'll be missed my friend.
viewtopic.php?f=32&t=15942
1987 Mustang LX Convertible, 2.3 Auto - cruiser.
1994 F 150 XLT 2WD
~ Yes - I adopted another cat..............
Cam L Milan,
You'll be missed my friend.
- charliemccraney
- Posts: 1743
- Joined: July 9, 2008, 10:02 pm
- Location: Lawrenceville, GA
I agree with the above statement.
Unless you're running a supercharger or turbo to achieve that power level, it is very unlikely that it will be happy cruising at 1800-2000rpm.
If the T5 is built, it will very likely handle that power just fine. What is your overdrive ratio? The G Force gears use .59 which will require a pretty short rear gear for cruising.
Unless you're running a supercharger or turbo to achieve that power level, it is very unlikely that it will be happy cruising at 1800-2000rpm.
If the T5 is built, it will very likely handle that power just fine. What is your overdrive ratio? The G Force gears use .59 which will require a pretty short rear gear for cruising.
Lawrenceville, Ga
1961 F100 Unibody
318 Y-block (292 +.070 bore, +.170 stroke), FMS T5-Z w/Mustang 10.5" diaphragm clutch.
1961 F100 Unibody
318 Y-block (292 +.070 bore, +.170 stroke), FMS T5-Z w/Mustang 10.5" diaphragm clutch.
-
Motocentro
- Posts: 145
- Joined: November 7, 2007, 9:05 pm
- Location: Atlanta
I second the 3.70's. My truck came stock with those behind a 240. There is a little less power in the 302 (of course) but you can get much better mileage - also they rev like a motorcycle compared to an big block (esp if you rollerize the entire valve-train). If you are doing a lot of around town driving this may not be the case. I do a little of both so they work out for me. Putting a "towing/economy" cam made a huge difference as well. I run a 302 with an Isky 257 roller, AOD through 3.70's in heavy Traffic (ATlanta proper, not suburbia) and it runs like a scalded dog when asked to.frdnut wrote:I've always felt the 302s were a little lacking in a truck(my daily driver is a 1996 5.0)..Especially if your looking for "grunt"..Since you have the 5 speed with an over drive gear I would go for a fairly low rear gear to help get you going..Something like a 3.70..
Wait - 3.89's? Maybe I have a 3.89. Not sure but i can say this:
Grunt at stoplight - check (actually "hell yes").
Fuel Mileage - check (when i keep my foot out of it)
Good midrange - check (highway driving is no joke. you should see the looks when a ricer or BMW pulls up and wants to play followed by a quick "walk-away" by my Slick).
Jim
My new signature.


