Question for Edelbrock Carb users...
-
dsrtjeeper
- Posts: 136
- Joined: September 15, 2010, 9:07 pm

Question for Edelbrock Carb users...
Are you running a regulator with your stock mechanical fuel pump? The Edelbrock carbs like around 5.5psi of fuel pressure and the stock FE fuel pumps put out up to 7psi. Just wondering if I should be concerned about pushing fuel past the needle valve.
Thanks!
Eric
Thanks!
Eric
1966 F100 LWB
Balanced 390 .060 over, Comp 270s, Performer RPM intake, Quick Fuel 680VS carb, full length headers, gasket matched/fully ported C6AE-R heads, 2-1/2" duals, C6 and 3:54 gears with Tracloc.
Balanced 390 .060 over, Comp 270s, Performer RPM intake, Quick Fuel 680VS carb, full length headers, gasket matched/fully ported C6AE-R heads, 2-1/2" duals, C6 and 3:54 gears with Tracloc.
Hmmm....maybe that's what's wrong with mine. I put an Edelbrock 1406 on my 352 about a year ago and I get 10mpg's at best. How much better is the Holley, Bill?Bill W wrote:i will say this Eric... i had a edelbrock carb on my 352 with a stock fuel pump (no regulator) talk about smelling gas all the time and 8 miles per gallon at best.
i did switch to a holley carb a few weeks ago, much better!
-
Brian Taylor
- Posts: 1469
- Joined: August 18, 2009, 3:52 pm
- Location: Dallas , Texas
- Contact:

I have ran a couple of Eddys on several cars, I personally do not use them anymore. I prefer the holley for easy of use and rebuilding, like others the MPG and other issues with the eddys.
I was really pleased with a road demon I used on my big block mopar. It was more responsive and better all around than the eddy I took off.
I am sure others will chime in with opinion for both sides, but like others I prefer a holley design.
I was really pleased with a road demon I used on my big block mopar. It was more responsive and better all around than the eddy I took off.
I am sure others will chime in with opinion for both sides, but like others I prefer a holley design.
1966 Ford F-100 LWB 300
-
dsrtjeeper
- Posts: 136
- Joined: September 15, 2010, 9:07 pm

I'm wondering if the problem that you all describe is simply a lack of a fuel regulator? I literally had gas in my oil. Edelbrock warns users about too much fuel pressure right on their site and it's got me thinking. My son is a mec hanic and we are going to throw the sniffer into the tail pipes to check air/fuel ratio. I'll let everyone know in a few days.
Thanks!
Eric
Thanks!
Eric
1966 F100 LWB
Balanced 390 .060 over, Comp 270s, Performer RPM intake, Quick Fuel 680VS carb, full length headers, gasket matched/fully ported C6AE-R heads, 2-1/2" duals, C6 and 3:54 gears with Tracloc.
Balanced 390 .060 over, Comp 270s, Performer RPM intake, Quick Fuel 680VS carb, full length headers, gasket matched/fully ported C6AE-R heads, 2-1/2" duals, C6 and 3:54 gears with Tracloc.
- PFM-64f100
- Posts: 1270
- Joined: August 7, 2006, 6:37 pm
- Location: Haslet, Texas
- Contact:
When I switched from a holley to ed I had to put a regulator on the input. The holley was ok up to about 7 psi the ed couldn't do anything more than 4psi. I know this because I am runing electric and could turn on pump and adjust/watch. when I went over 4 fuel was coming out the middle of carb. Hope this helps. i also read something way back then that they only like 4psi and below....

64 F100 short bed-style side-460-c6-with side toolbox and Dakota Front Suspension
And a 65 CrewCab
Chris W.
The pickups
65 Crew Cab
http://www.purpleflyingmonkey.com/CrewCab/index.html
64 F100
http://www.purpleflyingmonkey.com/1964- ... index.html
The Torino project http://www.purpleflyingmonkey.com/1971- ... eFile.html
And a 65 CrewCab
Chris W.
The pickups
65 Crew Cab
http://www.purpleflyingmonkey.com/CrewCab/index.html
64 F100
http://www.purpleflyingmonkey.com/1964- ... index.html
The Torino project http://www.purpleflyingmonkey.com/1971- ... eFile.html
I have never had any of these problems.
My 302 got horible milage and I could never get the jets right with the Holley. I switched to the Edelbrock and picked up 2mpg and much better response at low rpm. Ran a Blue holley elec fuel pump. 5psi if I remember right...sold it a long time ago.
I run an Edelbrock on my 300. I have a clear inline fuel filter and it never actualy fills with fuel, always has some air. It has a new mech fuel pump. I have never checked the press, but I bet it is low.
Guess I just have had good luck. I think it has a lot to do with having the proper setup. in the performance world there are a lot of variables. It is not fair to judge a combo or component based on large pools of data. If you have a lot of Chevy guys running Holleys because they are a better out of the box fit to a 350, then the data will skew the direction that Holley s are great out of the box.
A 390 needs to be jeted down and tuned out of the box to work on a 300. (To be fair so does an Edelbrock 500cfm)
If one carb is ALWAYS beter than another, why do they still make them? Engines are a picky beasts, it takes a lot of science and testing to get a good combo...when science is not availible, dumb luck and many iteration can be subsituted.

(PS, I prefer Edelbrocks)
My 302 got horible milage and I could never get the jets right with the Holley. I switched to the Edelbrock and picked up 2mpg and much better response at low rpm. Ran a Blue holley elec fuel pump. 5psi if I remember right...sold it a long time ago.
I run an Edelbrock on my 300. I have a clear inline fuel filter and it never actualy fills with fuel, always has some air. It has a new mech fuel pump. I have never checked the press, but I bet it is low.
Guess I just have had good luck. I think it has a lot to do with having the proper setup. in the performance world there are a lot of variables. It is not fair to judge a combo or component based on large pools of data. If you have a lot of Chevy guys running Holleys because they are a better out of the box fit to a 350, then the data will skew the direction that Holley s are great out of the box.
A 390 needs to be jeted down and tuned out of the box to work on a 300. (To be fair so does an Edelbrock 500cfm)
If one carb is ALWAYS beter than another, why do they still make them? Engines are a picky beasts, it takes a lot of science and testing to get a good combo...when science is not availible, dumb luck and many iteration can be subsituted.
(PS, I prefer Edelbrocks)
-
dsrtjeeper
- Posts: 136
- Joined: September 15, 2010, 9:07 pm

Here's a surefire way to see if your fuel pump has too much pressure for your Edelbrock....
While the vehicle is idling; look into the primaries of the carb and look for fuel dripping. If fuel is driping; the fuel pressure is pushing fuel past the needle valve.
Let me know if I'm wrong on this.
Eric
While the vehicle is idling; look into the primaries of the carb and look for fuel dripping. If fuel is driping; the fuel pressure is pushing fuel past the needle valve.
Let me know if I'm wrong on this.
Eric
1966 F100 LWB
Balanced 390 .060 over, Comp 270s, Performer RPM intake, Quick Fuel 680VS carb, full length headers, gasket matched/fully ported C6AE-R heads, 2-1/2" duals, C6 and 3:54 gears with Tracloc.
Balanced 390 .060 over, Comp 270s, Performer RPM intake, Quick Fuel 680VS carb, full length headers, gasket matched/fully ported C6AE-R heads, 2-1/2" duals, C6 and 3:54 gears with Tracloc.
